Pelletizing plants face significant challenges in maintaining sulfur dioxide (SO₂) emissions within regulatory limits due to the complex and dynamic nature of the process. During the conversion of iron ore fines into pellets for steel production, variations in the sulfur content of raw materials and fuels, together with fluctuations in process temperature, air distribution, and gas flow, lead to unpredictable SO₂ formation and release. Gas cleaning systems such as scrubbers and electrostatic precipitators play a crucial role, but their efficiency can vary with gas temperature, humidity, and reagent quality. Control room operators must simultaneously balance production rate, fuel efficiency, pellet quality, resource consumption, and emission compliance—objectives that often conflict.
Chemical process complexity
The SO2 absorption process relies on precise chemical reactions between calcium carbonate (CaCO3) or calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) and sulfur dioxide. Managing these reactions optimally requires balancing multiple variables including lime slurry concentration, water consumption, flow rates, temperature, and residence time. The chemical complexity made it difficult for operators to maintain consistent performance across varying operating conditions.
Reactor variability
The plant operates dual reactors for SO2 absorption, each with different characteristics and performance profiles. Variability between reactors, combined with fluctuating feed gas compositions and flow rates from the pelletization process, created unpredictable emissions patterns and buildup in the reactors. Operators struggled to maintain stable emissions and water exhaust while avoiding excessive lime consumption.
Emission deviations
Under operator control, daily SO2 emissions showed wide variability around the operating targets, creating uncertainty in operational planning.
Because all these variables interact in nonlinear and time-dependent ways, manual control strategies often forced operators to adopt conservative operating margins to ensure compliance under all circumstances. This presented a strong case for the implementation of Advanced Process Control (APC) strategies capable of predicting emissions, coordinating multivariable interactions, and dynamically optimizing process performance while maintaining robust environmental compliance.