Challenges to achieving ultimate control of the process include that each steelmaker may produce several different steel alloys, “different recipes”, says Sedén, that all behave differently during casting. Manufacturers may also run the caster in different formats – for example, wide or narrow – and at different speeds, which affects the rate of solidification and the conditions in the mold. These changes in the process need to be addressed, ideally by software adjusting to both programmed parameters and real-time data.
“What we're trying to get to,” says Sedén, “is a system that can aid operators in running these machines more efficiently, and in a safer way, identifying potential issues and reacting to them more quickly than the most experienced human can.”
He refers to the full closed-loop control system as the “holy grail” of steel manufacturing.
Some 20 or 30 years ago, Sedén says, “electromagnetic stirrers, or EMS, were manually operated – turned on or off with little nuance.” The next step implemented by ABB was parametric control, which, for example, allowed metals manufacturers to adjust the EMS in real time to varying casting speeds. “With that signal in the system, you could then automatically connect the EMS to apply a greater stirring strength if the casting speed was lower, for example.”
Today, the FC Mold Control's data patterns are fine-tuned based on quality system feedback as well as numerical simulations to deliver automatic online control of the FC Mold. This type of flow control is highly beneficial in dealing with planned variations in a caster, but it is still an open-loop one-way system which doesn’t capture unexpected, undesirable process alterations. The optimal process control solution is a closed-loop system that constantly adjusts to continuous sensor feedback from monitoring equipment that detects deviations from desired process characteristics.